Skip to content
SuperSeed Accelerator LogoSuperSeed Accelerator Logo
  • Portfolio
  • Team
  • Careers
  • Journal
  • Contact
Submit

Do VC generalists outperform specialists?

30.09.2023

Ai
Founders
Investment
Platform Venture Capital

Dan Bowyer
Partner​

"The journey to the top is long. Make sure you enjoy the ride!"

Dan Bowyer

Partner​

Dan has more than 20 years of entrepreneurial experience, having built and exited 2 startups and angel invested in many more. He’s most passionate about connecting people, product and process, creating something from nothing. ​At SuperSeed Dan looks after partnerships and portfolio companies, alongside new and existing investments. ​

Do VC generalists outperform specialists?
Share
TL;DR

Dan Bowyer reviews data showing sector-specialist VCs outperform generalists, especially smaller funds, and that hands-on 'platform' investors do better at the early stages, arguing a specialised approach will win in the next economic cycle.

Key Takeaways
  • PitchBook's study of 1,824 VCs over 20 years found sector-specific VCs outperform on median TVPI or IRR, most clearly in funds under $250m.
  • Generalists tend to do well in good times through diversification, mainly at later stages.
  • Research on 850 VCs found that investors who actively support their teams at the early stages perform better.
  • European seed startups were valued at around a 40% discount to US equivalents.
  • Dan Bowyer counts SuperSeed as a specialist: not in one sector, but focused on business optimisation and resource efficiency, at seed, with a platform approach.

And going forward, how will this unfold in the next economic cycle?

As a specialist VC, researching this note has been a fascinating excuse for a thought experiment or two. To start, let’s explore how to define what constitutes a specialist vs generalist.

Some industry analysts mark a specialist VC as someone who focuses on just one sector. I have a slightly different definition, which I’ll come back to later. For now, let’s take a look at the data.

According to Pitchbook, which looked at 1824 VCs over the last 20 years, it turns out that sector-specific VCs outperform (generally, looking at median TVPI or IRR).

Not by a huge margin until you look at smaller funds (sub $250m), where the specialist performance uplift is more impressive.

It’s hard to accurately unpack the data by stage, territory, or in context against inertia and the changing macro backdrop, but we can draw some conclusions.

Generalists seem to do well in good times through diversification, mainly at the later stages. As the specialists miss out on flash trends and in some cases take longer to return capital (especially those in deep tech).

Smaller funds tend to operate at the earlier stages where they can outperform by specialising in a niche, enabling them to focus, and attract ‘more of the same’ outstanding teams.

Horses and courses.

To sate my own thought experiments I wanted to look beyond sector specialists, and broad stage. What about Europe vs US? Earlier stages? VC platform vs no VC platform? Strategies and objectives?

Crystal balling the next decade.

This next economic cycle is going to be a fascinating one for the startup ecosystem with many counterfactuals duking it out. As the West decouples from the East amid war, with silicon tussles for protection, control and production – AI is enabling more software development power, more quickly. According to Scott Guthrie from Microsoft, 40% of code uploaded to Github in March was purely AI generated.

Investors who initially retracted with a nosebleed from recent VC excesses are now piling back into secondaries at a significant discount. Hot sectors such as web3, crypto and the metaverse are firmly back in their boxes while AI keeps the crazy lights on with outsized valuations and raise sizes.

Venture activity perceived as hot in the States over the last 10 years was actually hotter in Europe, according to a new Sifted report.

The surprising state of European venture.

What about platform VC?

Cory Bolotsky and Dale Chang looked at 850 VCs over the last 20 years to ask the question – does platform venture capital (investors who actively support their teams) perform better than those who do little beyond the cash.

You can intellectually answer the question both ways but the data shows that those who more actively support teams in the earlier stages perform better. Anecdotally I can add that the founders who constantly reach out and ask questions are doing better in our portfolio than those who don’t (not just from us or other investors, but via board, advisory and other smart networks).

Euro discounts.

In our small corner of the world at seed, in Europe, all of this is being accomplished at a 40% discount. European startups (graph on the left) are still significantly cheaper than across the pond (right).

Looking deeper at more data I’m going to challenge the terminology and put us, and those like us, back in the Specialist box. We don’t focus on one sector but we do focus on big business optimisation (or resource efficiency, depending on which side of the seesaw you’re sitting). And we do focus at seed, using a platform approach, to serve technical teams solving enterprise scale problems. Pretty specialised in my books! And benefitting from all of the same upsides as the sector specialists.

So how will this play out for the next decade?

There is nothing to suggest that the next ‘good times’ is anywhere close (but boom and bust *will* consistently rotate because, humans). It looks like we’ll generally see a protracted period of low economic growth for most (read ‘opportunity for startups’). Sure IPOs will creep back, more trade sales will consolidate sectors to gain competitive advantage, as those without solid units will close their doors.

Looking forwards we still have fundamental challenges to face that will absolutely need fundamentals startups to innovate and fuel our future. Those focusing on climate, manufacturing, efficiency, agriculture, energy, water, supply chains etc will continue to do well – as all businesses become AI businesses. Against a backdrop of sluggish markets, high(er) interest rates, and no more free money.

All of which suggests a specialised approach will win, however we choose to define that, and maybe now is a great excuse for new kinds of definable VC specialists? Perhaps even one that looks beyond financial returns for our new world.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do specialist VCs outperform generalists?

According to PitchBook data on 1,824 VCs over 20 years, sector-specific VCs generally outperform, though not by a huge margin except among smaller funds under $250m, where the uplift is more impressive.

Does platform venture capital lead to better returns?

A study of 850 VCs over 20 years found that investors who more actively support their teams at the early stages perform better. Dan Bowyer adds that SuperSeed's founders who constantly ask questions of their networks tend to do better.

How does Dan Bowyer define a specialist VC?

Not only as a single-sector investor. He argues a fund like SuperSeed, which focuses on big-business optimisation at seed with a platform approach for technical teams, is specialised and benefits from the same advantages.

Share

Related

Should You Buy Anthropic at $2 Trillion?
31.10.2026
The Second Half
30.09.2026
How Worried Should We Be About AI?
27.09.2026
The World Is Still Figuring Out How to Use AI
31.08.2026
Humanoids – The Newton or the iPhone?
31.07.2026

APPLY FOR FUNDING

Submit your investor deck
and get a response in minutes

Uploading your deck...

You'll be redirected to the application form in a moment.

Having trouble? Contact us.

SuperSeed Accelerator Logo
Privacy Policy
Close

Stay up to date via our newsletter

Sign up with your email address to receive news and updates.

SuperSeed Accelerator Logo
Company
  • Portfolio
  • Team
  • Careers
  • Journal
  • Contact
  • ESG
Investors
  • SuperSeed Capital
  • Fund Facts
  • Documents
  • Board of Directors
  • Media Kit
Get in touch
  • Apply for funding
  • Email
  • LinkedIn
Newsletter
By subscribing to our newsletter, you accept our Privacy Policy. Submit

CAPITAL AT RISK. Read more about the key risks of investing here.

Investing in early stage companies involves risks including loss of capital, illiquidity, lack of dividends and dilution. The availability of tax relief depends on individual investors' circumstances, and on investee companies' qualifying status, both of which may be subject to change. All contents ©2026 SuperSeed Ventures LLP registered in England and Wales under registration number OC424095. Our registered office is 27 Old Gloucester Street, London, WC1N 3AX and our principal place of business is at 231-232 Strand, London WC2R 1DA. SuperSeed Ventures LLP is Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FRN 920283)

© SuperSeed Ventures LLP 2026
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • Privacy Policy
  • {title}